Information on Niki Ngo
Nikki and Rob both tried hard to falsely accuse Lauriston of child abuse to multiple police departments and hospitals. They all concluded it was a false allegation even with statements from Lauriston "Logan" IV that he was not hurt by his father and he loved him.
This was Nikki's response:
The following is based on her own words, contradictions, false allegations with no backing or evidence ever provided.
Police Report False Abuse Charges
Nikki filed an “emergency motion” to remove access between the child and the father based on no emergency condition at the time. No emergency Question 1 and Question 2
Page 27: Medical diagnoses of Lauriston III by Nikki with no medical backing
Page 31: Racial and Homophobic slander by Nikki
Page 32: Sleeping in Lauriston IV’s bed Current phone calls (when he was allowed to talk to his son) show this is ongoing.
Page 34: Nikki “I would limit him to supervised visitations”
Page 43: Cottingham lost Lauriston IV on side of mountain requiring Ski patrol assistance
Page 51: Nikki refusing to access during Christmas. States “Logan would regress”
Page 59: Nikki wants Cottingham to adopt Lauriston IV
Page 59: “Q. And you would like to see him just gone, is that right, out of Lauriston’s life?
A. Yes”
Page 61: Refuses to take Polygraph
Page 63: Accuses Lauriston IV of lying, then Claims didn’t bite, then it was play biting
Page 66: Admitted she did not check if there were bite marks
Page 68: Accuses Lauriston IV of lying when he says he want to be with his dad even though Cottingham states that “I don’t understand why he wants to be with him when, you know, we’re so much better”
Page 72: Reaffirms Lauriston III needs to be out of his son’s life
Page 80: Claims a history of violence, then states only the recalled accident
Page 83: Attempted to document false abuse claims
Page 84: States never seen abuse towards son
Page 86: “He’s not good for him”
Page 87: All contact with son monitored and recorded till 15
Page 90: Refuses to acknowledge Lauriston IV wanting to return to Lauriston IV’s home
Page 91: “Now, it is your goal never for him to be back at his father’s house normally? Is that your goal? A. Yes”
Page 91: Decided when court action that he “Q…. Lauriston Crocket III had to leave his son’s life”
“A. yes”
“By any means possible?”
“A. Yes”
“Q. Right?”
“A. Yes”
Page 92: When asked about Lauriston IV crying over not being with his dad “Q… You want him to just get over it, right, and you have no plan or no hopes for having a normal sharing or parenting?”
“A. We did”
Page 94: “He doesn’t know any better” when informed that Lauriston IV runs back to his father multiple times to hug him before leaving Hanna’s house visits.
Page 95: “He’s a danger to my son.” – can’t say why
Page 98: “Q. Mr. Cottingham has suggested to you that we need to punish Lauriston for Lying?”
“A. Yes”
Page 109: “You have no intention of changing your attitude toward Mr. Crockett or his relationship with his son?”
“A. He is a danger to Logan”
Biting
